Measurement of Intraocular Pressures Using Rebound Tonometry in South American Fur Seals (Arctocephalus australis) and South American Sea Lions (Otaria flavescens) from Punta San Juan, Peru
IAAAM 2017
Julie D. Sheldon1*+; Michael J. Adkesson2; Matthew Allender3; Gwen Jankowski4; Susana Cárdenas-Alayza2,5
1Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA; 2Chicago Zoological Society, Brookfield Zoo, Brookfield, IL, USA; 3Wildlife Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Comparative Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA; 4Denver Zoo, Denver, CO, USA; 5Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru

Abstract

Ocular diseases are reported in both free-ranging pinnipeds and those under professional care.1,2,3,4,5 Intraocular pressures (IOP) are part of any complete ophthalmologic examination, but limited data exists from free-ranging pinnipeds.6 Between 2010–2016, IOP was measured using rebound tonometry (TonoVet, Jorgensen Laboratories) in 108 South American fur seals (Arctocephalus australis; 81 adults, 27 juveniles) and 37 adult South American sea lions (Otaria flavescens) at Punta San Juan, Peru. Animals were anesthetized for concurrent population health projects using isoflurane only; medetomidine, midazolam, and butorphanol (MMB); MMB + isoflurane; or alfaxalone. Animals in abnormal health or with gross ocular abnormalities were excluded from data analysis. A series of multivariate general linear models (MANOVA) was performed with IOP of the right (OD) and left (OS) eyes as dependent variables, and species, sex, age (adult, juvenile), year, and restraint method as the main effects to determine factors affecting IOP. Results show that age was the only factor associated with significantly different IOP (p<0.001). Juveniles had lower mean IOP than adults (Table 1). This finding is dissimilar to canine studies that show no difference between juveniles and adults,7 but consistent with Humboldt penguins, another marine species, in which chicks exhibit lower IOP.8 There were no significant differences in IOP among species, year, sex, or restraint method. The mean IOPs in this study are similar to California sea lions (32.8 ± 3.2 mm Hg) under professional care.6 This is the first study to the authors' knowledge reporting IOP in wild pinnipeds.

Table 1

  

Mean IOP (mm Hg)

95% Confidence Interval (mm Hg)

Juvenile OD

17.52

14.0–21.1

Juvenile OS

18.4

14.4–22.5

Adult OD

32.9

30.8–35.0

Adult OS

32.3

30.0–31.6

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Marco Cardeña, Franco Garcia, Maria José Ganoza, Paulo Colchao, John Pauley, Kate Sladek, Mary Ann Duda, Ashlee Webb, and Jenny Meegan for their assistance with this project. We gratefully acknowledge support from SERNANP and facility access by Agrorural, as well as funding support from the Chicago Board of Trade Endangered Species Fund.

* Presenting author
+ Student presenter

Literature Cited

1.  Colitz CMH, Renner MS, Manire CA, Doescher B, Schmitt TL, Osborn SD, Croft L, Olds J, Gehring E, Mergl J, Tuttle AD, Sutherland-Smith M, Rudnick JC. 2010. Characterization of progressive keratitis in otariids. Veterinary Ophthalmology. 13:47–53.

2.  Erlacher-Reid C, Colitz CMH, Abrams K, Smith A, Tuttle AD. 2011. Bilateral ocular abnormalities in a wild stranded harp seal (Phoca groenlandica) suggestive of anterior segment dysgenesis and persistent hyperplastic primary vitreous. In: AAZV 42nd Annual Conference Proceedings, Kansas City, MO; 300–303.

3.  Greenwood AG. 1985. Prevalence of ocular anterior segment disease in captive pinnipeds. Aquatic Mammals. 1:13–15.

4.  Hanson MT, Aguirre AA, Braun RC. 2009. Clinical observations of ocular disease in Hawaiian monk seals (Monachus schauinslandi). NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-PIFSC 1–17.

5.  Stoskopf MK, Zimmerman S, Hirst LW, Green R. 1985. Ocular anterior segment disease in northern fur seals. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 187(11):1141–1144.

6.  Mejia-Fava JC, Hoffman EM, Colitz CMH, Jack SW, Ballweber L, Rodriguez M, Renner MS, Schmmitt T, Dalton LM, Osborn S, Gearhart SA, Croft LA, Dold C, Tuttle AD, Romano TA, Clemons-Chevis CL. 2009. Use of rebound tonometry as a diagnostic tool to diagnose glaucoma in the captive California sea lion. In: IAAAM 40th Annual Conference Proceedings, Galveston, TX.

7.  Mughannam AJ, Cook CS, Fritz CL. 2004. Change in intraocular pressure during maturation in Labrador Retriever dogs. Veterinary Ophthalmology. 7(2):87–89.

8.  Sheldon JD, Adkesson MJ, Allender MC, Jankowski G, Langan J, Cardena M, Cardenas-Alayza S. 2017. Determination of tear production and intraocular pressure with rebound tonometery in wild Humboldt penguins (Spheniscus humboldti). Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery. 31(1): In Press.

  

Speaker Information
(click the speaker's name to view other papers and abstracts submitted by this speaker)

Julie D. Sheldon
College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee
Knoxville, TN, USA


MAIN : Poster Session : Measurement of Intraocular Pressures
Powered By VIN
SAID=27