Brain SPECT When Structural Imaging Fails To Offer Diagnostic Clues
WSAVA/FECAVA/BSAVA World Congress 2012
Kathelijne Peremans, DVM, CertVR, DECVDI, PhD
Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium

Structural imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT) and especially magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offer the opportunity to visualise brain anatomy in great detail. CT is widely used now in veterinary medicine. Indeed in many cases CT helps in the formulation of a therapeutic plan. However, when available, MRI is superior for imaging certain pathology of the nervous system. The images are obtained, by using different sequences, so composition of tissue can be determined and differentiated which improves the diagnostic potential.

The higher the strength of the magnet, the better anatomical detail will be. With a 7-Tesla magnet, resolution of 0.1 mm can be obtained which reaches the histological resolution level. With this magnet even small vessel defects in cerebrovascular disease are visualised. However, these imaging modalities are great to demonstrate structural pathology, but fail when pathology is strictly functional and without anatomical alteration.

Brain single photon emission tomography (SPECT) is a functional imaging modality based on the use of radioactive markers. After intravenous injection, these compounds will pass the blood-brain barrier and will be trapped inside the neuron by enzymatic conversion. This mechanism implies two conditions: first the amount of tracer reaching the different brain regions, which will depend on the regional per-fusion. In the nineteenth century, it was demonstrated in dogs that regional brain blood flow correlates with neuronal function. Decreased function is translated as reduced blood flow. Second, the neuron has to function normally in order to enable enzymatic conversion of the tracer. Two tracers can be used for this purpose, 99mTc-HMPAO and 99mTc-ECD, each with basically similar trapping mechanisms. These markers will thus reflect regional blood flow (hypo- or hyperperfusion) and associated neuronal function (hypo- or hyperfunction). An advantage is that, due to the trapping mechanism, imaging after injection of the tracer does not need to be done immediately and can be postponed for a certain time. The images obtained after the time interval, will reflect the functional state of the brain at the time of injection. This is an interesting characteristic, especially of use in epileptic patients during an epileptic fit, the optimal time to localise the focus of activity, but also an impossible time to obtain images. In people with refractory epilepsy SPECT is used presurgically to detect the seizure focus. Images are obtained interictally and at the onset of the fit. The start of the injection can be coordinated with the onset of the seizure by means of electroencephalogram (EEG) activity registration. Often the patient will start the injection him/herself at the time he/she feels the seizure starting. After analysing the images by visual inspection, or even better by subtraction analysis (ictal data - interictal data), the focus will be determined which will be surgically removed if possible.

In this lecture, some preliminary canine results will be demonstrated. Dogs with primary epilepsy were investigated with SPECT in the interictal state. Reduced activity was registered in the subcortical area. Due to resolution limits at the time of that investigation, we were not able to define the subcortical structures in much detail. However, this subcortical region includes the thalamus, a region often allocated as being involved in seizure progression. Recently, new software and Hi-SPECT became available for the use in dogs. These techniques improve the resolution to a great extent. This paves the way to explore the sub-cortical areas in more detail.

Brain SPECT may also be advantageous in behaviour disorders. Unless structural pathology provokes behaviour disturbances, CT and MRI are not informative in the investigation of animals with behaviour disorders. Since brain perfusion reflects neuronal function, dysfunctioning brain regions can be recognised. The two most important brain structures responsible for behaviour are the frontal cortex and the limbic system. These two have to work in complete harmony with each other; the frontal cortex reflecting the actions impelled by the limbic system on sensorial triggers from the outside. If in disharmony, inappropriate reactions will evolve, triggered by stimulation from the outside. In many behavioural disorders alterations are present in these areas. However, this is an oversimplification and other brain regions may be involved, as the brain is one large electrical circuit with many relays. In addition to good functioning neurons, neurotransmitter systems have to function in an optimal way as well to secure normal behaviour.

Probably the best known neurotransmitter systems are the serotonergic, dopaminergic and noradrenergic systems. However, the list is of course longer. The serotonergic system is considered one of the most important systems in maintaining normal behaviour. The compound 'Prozac', used as a mood stabiliser, has its major action on the serotonergic system by increasing the amount of serotonin available in the brain. As an example, impulse control disorders are linked with deficiencies in the serotonergic system. Several studies including a variety of animals (from primates to spiders) demonstrated that a low serotonergic tone in the brain is linked with 'risk taking' or 'impulsive' behaviour. Another important pathway in behaviour is the dopaminergic system, involved in Parkinson's disease amongst other disorders.

For several compounds (e.g., receptors, transporters) of these neurotransmitter systems, specific radioactive tracers have been developed. These markers will specifically bind with their target and will give an idea of the number of receptors and transporters present in different brain regions. In the diseased brain, deficiencies of neurotransmitter systems can be detected in this way. We investigated dogs with several specific behavioural abnormalities: impulsive aggression, anxiety disorders and compulsive disorders. Depending on the disorder, abnormalities were present at the level of the serotonergic receptor 2A, the serotonergic transporter and the dopaminergic transporter respectively in specific brain areas. Another important domain for investigation is in vivo registration of effects of (psycho)-pharmaca. With these specific markers a prediction can be made whether or not certain psychopharmaca will be useful in a particular patient and therapy outcome can be monitored. The effect on neuronal activity and interaction with neurotransmitter systems can be investigated, and optimal dosing can be explored. This imaging modality is, besides its use in a clinical set-up, also an important asset in research and development of new compounds.

In conclusion, SPECT imaging with dedicated tracers is an important additive tool to CT and MRI in the investigation of epilepsy, behavioural problems and effect of drugs on neurons and transmitter systems.

Acknowledgement

Thanks to S. Vermeire DVM PhD and V. Martlé DVM DipECVN.

References

1.  Martlé V, Peremans K, et al. Regional brain perfusion in epileptic dogs evaluated with technetium-99m-ethylcysteinate dimer SPECT. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound 2009;50:655–659.

2.  Peremans K, Audenaert K, et al. Evaluation of the brain 5-HT2A receptor binding index and regional brain perfusion in the impulsive, aggressive dog measured with SPECT. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2003;30:1538–1546.

3.  Peremans K, Audenaert K, et al. The effect of citalopram hydrobromide on 5-HT2A receptors in the impulsive aggressive dog measured with 123I-5-I R91150 SPECT. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2005;32:708–716.

4.  Vermeire S, Audenaert K, et al. Evaluation of the brain 5-HT2A receptor binding index in dogs with anxiety disorders, measured with 123I-5I-R91150 and SPECT. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2009;50:284–289.

  

Speaker Information
(click the speaker's name to view other papers and abstracts submitted by this speaker)

Kathelijne Peremans, DVM, CertVR, DECVDI, PhD
Department of Medical Imaging
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University
Salisburylaan , Merelbeke, Belgium


SAID=27