A Comparative Study of Intravenous Regional Anesthesia, and Brachial Plexus Block Using Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Dogs
World Small Animal Veterinary Association World Congress Proceedings, 2004
Rafael DeRossi, DVM, MSc, PhD; Gustavo G Macedo, DVM, Fabricio O Frazilio; Gabriel L de S Miguel
Department of Veterinary Medicine - Surgery and Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul State, Brazil

The purpose of this study was to compare the use of hyperbaric bupivacaine in two types of blockades for distal forelimbs in dogs: brachial plexus block (BP) and intravenous regional anesthesia (IRA).

A prospective randomized study was conducted in 14 healthy dogs to compare the anesthetic and motor blocking, and hemodynamic and respiratory effects of the 2 anesthetic regional blockades. Animals were divided into two treatment groups of 7 animals each. Treatment 1.

BP - a 0.25% hyperbaric bupivacaine solution (3 mg/kg) was injected close proximity to the brachial artery and radial, median, ulnar, musculocutaneous, and axillary nerves. Brachial plexus was localized by using a nerve localizer (Xomed Vari-Stim®).

Treatment 2.

IRA - 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine solution (0.5 mg/kg) was injected into the radial vein after a tourniquet has been placed above the umero-radial joint (it remained for the first 20 minutes). All animals of both groups were sedated with 1% acepromazine. Anesthetic and motor-blocking, cardiovascular and respiratory effects were evaluated at predefined regular intervals of time before the sedation and infiltration of the blockades (baseline) and after administration. Cutaneous areas for the nerves of the distal forelimb were tested for nociceptive sensation by pinching the skin with hemostats.

Four of the 7 dogs in the IRA treatment presented painful reaction to the bupivacaine injection. Complete anesthesia was present before (mean +/- SD = 15 +/- 4 vs 25 +/- 6 minutes) and lasted longer (456 +/- 96 vs 175 +/- 80 minutes) for the BP versus IRA, respectively. None of the animals of IRA treatment presented complete blockade in the studied areas. In the BP group, all animals presented ptosis in the distal forelimb blockade. Motor blockade lasted longer and was more evident in the BP treatment. There was no significance difference (p<0.05) in the heart rate in both groups. There was no significant difference in the blood pressure measurements in the IRA treatment. In the BP treatment a significant decrease (p<0.05) of systolic blood pressure that lasted for 30 to 360 minutes was observed. There was a significant decrease of respiratory rate in the in the BP treatment (5 to 450 minutes) and in IRA treatment (30 to 170 minutes).

Conclusion

The brachial plexus block with 0.25% hyperbaric bupivacaine solution produces in the distal forelimb a safer and more efficient anesthesia, which duration lasts longer than an intravenous regional anesthesia with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in dogs. The brachial plexus block induces ptosis and respiratory depression and has little influence upon the cardiovascular system.

Speaker Information
(click the speaker's name to view other papers and abstracts submitted by this speaker)

Rafael DeRossi, DVM, MSc, PhD
Department of Veterinary Medicine - Surgery and Anaesthesiology
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine
Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul State, Brazil


MAIN : Abstracts : Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
Powered By VIN

Friendly Reminder to Our Colleagues: Use of VIN content is limited to personal reference by VIN members. No portion of any VIN content may be copied or distributed without the expressed written permission of VIN.

Clinicians are reminded that you are ultimately responsible for the care of your patients. Any content that concerns treatment of your cases should be deemed recommendations by colleagues for you to consider in your case management decisions. Dosages should be confirmed prior to dispensing medications unfamiliar to you. To better understand the origins and logic behind these policies, and to discuss them with your colleagues, click here.

Images posted by VIN community members and displayed via VIN should not be considered of diagnostic quality and the ultimate interpretation of the images lies with the attending clinician. Suggestions, discussions and interpretation related to posted images are only that -- suggestions and recommendations which may be based upon less than diagnostic quality information.

CONTACT US

777 W. Covell Blvd., Davis, CA 95616

vingram@vin.com

PHONE

  • Toll Free: 800-700-4636
  • From UK: 01-45-222-6154
  • From anywhere: (1)-530-756-4881
  • From Australia: 02-6145-2357
SAID=27