Interpreting Radiographic Signs in the Abdomen
World Small Animal Veterinary Association World Congress Proceedings, 2006
Christopher R. Lamb, MA, VetMB, DACVR, DECVDI, ILTM, MRCVS
Department of Veterinary Clinical Science, The Royal Veterinary College, North Mymms, Herts, UK

The radiologic (roentgen) signs are abnormal:

 Number

 Position

 Size

 Shape

 Opacity

 Margination

Memorize this list and apply it routinely when considering any potential abnormality that you have identified in any diagnostic image. Although this sounds very basic, these abnormalities are the basis for all radiologic diagnoses and this list of criteria applies equally well to radiography, ultrasonography, CT and MRI.

Abnormal Number

Ability to count structures radiographically depends on their correct identification. This is not always possible because, for example, many normal anatomical structures are not visible radiographically (e.g., adrenal glands). Conversely, certain structures that are normally visible may be obliterated as a result of physiological variants (e.g., lack of body fat) or disease.

Potential causes of abnormal number in the abdomen:

 Decreased

 Congenital absence (rare)

 Small organ, e.g., kidney, bladder

 Displaced organ

 Ruptured diaphragm

 Perineal rupture

 Hernia

 Organ not recognised, e.g., because it is deformed

 Renal mass

 Increased

 Enlargement of normally invisible structures

 Lymph nodes

 Uterus

 Lesion mimicking normal organ

 Paraprostatic cyst mimicking bladder

 Adrenal mass mimicking kidney

Abnormal Position

Potential causes of abnormal position in the abdomen:

 Congenital (ectopia--rare)

 Displacement

 Mass effect

 Abnormal mobility

 Ruptured diaphragm

 Hernia

 Volvulus, e.g., stomach

 Torsion, e.g., spleen

 Adhesions

 Surgical implantation

 Kidney

Problems with Assessment of Organ Position in the Abdomen

Radiographic descriptions of organ position and borders are often limited because they are deduced from relatively few projections, say lateral and ventrodorsal.

Abnormal position, i.e., as a result of displacement of an organ, may be the principal radiographic sign that a mass is present, and is a particularly important sign if the mass itself is not visible. Consider a dog with a hepatic mass: caudal displacement of the stomach may be the only radiographic abnormality. The caudal surface of the liver that contacts the stomach is not normally visible radiographically; therefore the presence of a mass cannot change its appearance. On the other hand, the position of the lumen of the stomach is influenced by the position of the caudal border of the liver and is normally visible because of the gas it contains. Therefore, a change in the position or shape of the gastric lumen is likely to be the only sign of a hepatic mass bulging from the caudal surface of the liver.

It is often possible to make an assessment of the origin of a mass by the direction of displacement of adjacent organs. Mobile abdominal viscera, principally the small intestine, are displaced away from the point of origin of the mass. For example, a mass originating by the bladder will be expected to displace small intestine cranially; a mass originating in the mesenteric root will displace the intestine peripherally. The larger the mass, the more marked any displacement is likely to be. Even relatively fixed organs, such as the kidneys may be displaced by a gradually enlarging mass.

Abnormal Size

Potential causes of abnormal size in the abdomen:

 Increased

 Hypertrophy

 Compensatory hypertrophy of contralateral kidney in unilateral renal disease

 Hyperplasia

 Prostatic

 Congestion/oedema

 Infiltration (usually diffuse)

 Acute inflammation

 Neoplasia, e.g., lymphoma

 Fat, e.g., affecting the liver in diabetes mellitus

 Glycogen, e.g., affecting the liver in hyperadrenocorticism

 Obstruction

 Gastric outflow

 Intestinal

 Ureteral

 Urethral

 Uterine/vaginal

 Decreased

 Congenital (hypoplasia)

 Atrophy

 Chronic inflammation

 Hypovolaemia, e.g., small liver in hypoadrenocorticism

 Previous resection

Problems Associated with Recognition of Abnormal Organ Size in the Abdomen

We can recognise abnormal organ size only when we know how fairly precisely big the normal organ is in an animal of the same body weight as the patient in question; however, there are marked variations in conformation between different breeds of dog and between individuals of the same breed that tend to limit the usefulness of organ measurements. As a result there are very few measurements that are useful aids to diagnosis--don't bother trying to measure the liver or spleen, for example.

Rather than a direct measurement, radiographic measurements of organ size frequently use a bone landmark as a reference point to take account of the effects of magnification and variations in body size, e.g., the canine kidney is about 3xL2.

Abnormal Shape

Note that the silhouette of an irregular object varies greatly depending on its orientation whereas the silhouette of a rounded, regular object does not. Perhaps radiologists are fortunate that many important pathological structures, including primary neoplasms and metastases, are roughly spherical so may be recognised whatever the radiographic projection.

Only a very uniform, diffuse disease (e.g., congestion/oedema, acute inflammation) is likely to change the size of an organ without affecting its shape. Whereas a change in shape is usually the result of a focal or multifocal lesion(s).

Potential causes of abnormal shape in the abdomen:

 Mass

 Physiological enlargement, e.g., urinary bladder

 Neoplasm

 Haematoma

 Inflammatory lesion, e.g., abscess

 Obstruction causing dilatation

 Cyst (or pseudocyst)

 Torsion, e.g., spleen, retained testicle

 Scarring

 Chronic inflammation

 Previous surgery

 Impingement by adjacent structure

 Displaced organ

 Mass

Abnormal Opacity

Summary of potential opacity changes in disease.

Normal opacity

Change in opacity

Examples

upwards arrow

downwards arrow

Gas/air

--

Soft tissue

Intraluminal gastric mass

 

Calcification

Bone in GI tract

Fat

--

Calcification

Fat necrosis

Soft tissue

Gas

 

Gas-forming infection

   

Hollow foreign body

 

Calcification

Urinary calculi

   

Chronic haemorrhage

Bone

Soft tissue

Bone cyst, lytic lesion

 
 

Metallic

Surgical implants

Abnormal Margination

A difference in opacity must be present between adjacent structures for their edges to be visible radiographically.

Imagine a typical radiograph of an animal. The bones are visible because they are more opaque than the adjacent tissues (cartilage, muscle, ligament) as a result of their higher physical density and calcium content. The edge of the bone (= periosteal surface) is a bone: soft tissue interface. Changes in the appearance of bone margins, such as irregular or indistinct margins, which may represent a periosteal reaction, are important signs of diseases affecting the bone.

Similarly, the edges or margins of various abdominal organs are normally visible because they are more opaque that the surrounding fat, which appears as a darker grey around the liver, spleen, kidneys, etc. If no fat is present, for example if the patient is very thin due to chronic illness, the difference in opacity that produced the organ edges initially is no longer present and therefore the organs are invisible. If the fat is infiltrated by inflammatory cells or displaced by peritoneal fluid the margins of the abdominal organs may become indistinct or blurred. Conversely the margins of abdominal organs may be particularly sharp in an animal with pneumoperitoneum. Hence in the abdomen, margination of the various organs tends to reflect changes in their surroundings rather than organ disease per se.

Potential causes of abnormal margination in the abdomen:

Decreased clarity of organ margins

 Surrounding fluid

 Retroperitoneal

 Peritoneal

 Serosal lesion

 Adhesions (chronic peritonitis)

 Carcinomatosis

 Adherent clots (blood, proteinaceous)

 Lack of surrounding fat

 Juvenile patient

 Chronic disease causing weight loss

 Enhanced margins

 Surrounding gas

 Retroperitoneal

 Peritoneal

 Calcified margins

 Paraprostatic cyst

 Contrast study

Speaker Information
(click the speaker's name to view other papers and abstracts submitted by this speaker)

Christopher R. Lamb, MA, VetMB, DACVR, DECVDI, ILTM, MRCVS
Department of Veterinary Clinical Science
The Royal Veterinary College,
North Mymms, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom


MAIN : Diagnostic Imaging : Radiographic Signs: Abdomen
Powered By VIN
SAID=27