Impact of Removing Dietary Supplementation on Serum Nutrient Concentrations in a Managed Population of Southern Stingray (Dasyatis americana)
IAAAM 2017
Scott M. Williams1*; Amanda J. Ardente1,2; Natalie D. Mylniczenko1; Tristan L. Guttridge3; Kathleen E. Sullivan1; Shannon Livingston1; Eduardo V. Valdes1,2,4,5
1Disney's Animals, Science, and Environment, Lake Buena Vista, FL, USA; 2University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; 3Bimini Biological Field Station Foundation, Miami, FL, USA; 4University of Guelph, ON, Canada; 5University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA

Abstract

Disney manages two distinct populations of female southern stingrays (Dasyatis americana) at The Seas, Orlando, FL, and at Castaway Cay, Bahamas. Stingrays are housed in artificial (Orlando) or natural (Bahamas) seawater. We previously reported significant differences between these two populations based on eight years of routinely collected serum data.1 The aim of this study was to assess whether removal of dietary supplementation impacts serum nutrients, hypothesizing reduced managed animal serum concentrations, comparable to wild cohorts. In order to better understand our supplementation regimen, we removed daily vitamin supplementation (Mazuri Shark/Ray-low cobalt, 5M1Y) from the diets of The Seas population. After 13 months, we observed reductions in total serum iodine, cobalt, copper, and manganese concentrations (p<0.05) in unsupplemented rays (n=11) compared to control (n=36). Wild population samples (n=14, female) were collected in partnership with the Bimini Biological Field Station, Bimini, Bahamas. Compared to the wild samples, The Seas rays without supplementation had no significant difference in serum total and inorganic iodine (p>0.08 and p>0.5, respectively). Although serum manganese remained numerically greater in The Seas rays (10.6 vs. 3.65 ng/kg), this was not significant (p=0.17) due to high standard deviation for the sample size. Cobalt (p<0.001) and copper (p<0.05) both remained significantly higher in The Seas population versus wild rays. These findings suggest the current level of recommended supplementation may not be necessary in managed southern stingrays, with further research warranted to determine appropriate recommendations.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Animal Husbandry and Animal Health teams at The Seas and Castaway Cay for all of their hard work in the feeding, care, management, handling, and welfare of the animals; as well as their skilled sample collection. We would also like to thank the staff at the Bimini Biology Field Station Foundation for their efforts in making our wild sample collection possible.

* Presenting author

Literature Cited

1.  Williams S, Sullivan K, Livingston S, Valdes EV. 2016. Impact of dietary supplementation of southern stingrays (Dasyatis americana) held under human care - an eight year retrospective. Comparative Nutrition Society 11th Biennial Symposium. Rio Grande, Puerto Rico.

  

Speaker Information
(click the speaker's name to view other papers and abstracts submitted by this speaker)

Scott M. Williams, MS
Disney's Animals, Science, and Environment
Lake Buena Vista, FL, USA


MAIN : Aquatic Animal Challenges : Impact of Removing Dietary Supplementation
Powered By VIN
SAID=27