Establishing a Reference Genome for the Northern Leopard Frog (Rana pipiens) to Study Neurotoxic Mechanisms of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Developmental Exposure
IAAAM 2022
Hannah G. Smith1*+; Tyler D. Hoskins1; Amanda Pendleton2; Marisol S. Sepulveda1; Jason R. Cannon3
1Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA; 2Department of Biochemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA; 3Purdue Institute for Integrative Neuroscience, West Lafayette, IN, USA

Abstract

Per and polyfluoralkyl substances (PFAS) are a diverse class of anthropogenic “forever chemicals” of major public health concern due to their widespread use, long environmental and biological half-lives, presence in human plasma, and multiple links to adverse health outcomes.1 They have been found in the brains of wildlife, and the literature supports their potential neurotoxicity. The Northern leopard frog (Rana pipiens) has been specifically selected to evaluate the hypothesized exacerbated effects of PFAS on neurodegenerative diseases. Unlike the traditional toxicological models (e.g., nematodes, fly, mouse, and rat), R. pipiens produce human-like neuromelanin (NM), a pigment in the brain’s substantia nigra that modulates neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinson’s disease.2 PFAS has been proven to cross the blood-brain barrier and accumulate in the brain of this species.3 Developmental exposure to PFAS, specifically perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), were also shown to selectively decrease brain dopamine levels and produce complex changes within neurotransmitter systems in R. pipiens.4 A reference R. pipiens genome was assembled to track neurotoxic mechanism and sublethal responses following PFAS exposure. This assembly will permit the analysis of gene expression changes in the brain following PFAS exposure and whether these genes and their pathways may be novel or linked to neurodegenerative disease candidates proposed in traditional toxicological models and humans.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program, Department of Defense, United States of America, and the Ralph W. and Grace M. Showalter Research Trust, United States of America, for their contributions to this comprehensive study.

Literature Cited

1.  Moody, CA, Hebert, GN, Strauss, SH, Field, JA. 2003. Occurrence and persistence of perfluorooctanesulfonate and other perfluorinated surfactants in groundwater at a fire-training area at Wurtsmith Air Force Base, Michigan, USA. J. Environ. Monit. 5(2), 341–345.

2.  Foguth, RM, Sepúlveda, MS, & Cannon, J. 2020. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) neurotoxicity in Sentinel and non-traditional laboratory model systems: Potential Utility in predicting adverse outcomes in human health. Toxics, 8(2), 42.

3.  Foguth, RM, Hoskins, TD, Clark, GC, Nelson, M., Flynn, RW, de Perre, C., Hoverman, JT, Lee, LS, Sepúlveda, MS, & Cannon, JR. 2020. Single and mixture per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances accumulate in developing northern leopard frog brains and produce complex neurotransmission alterations. Neurotoxicology and Teratology, 81, 106907.

4.  Foguth, RM, et al. 2019. Developmental exposure to perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS)

5.  and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) selectively decreases brain dopamine levels in Northern leopard frogs. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 377, 114623.

 

Speaker Information
(click the speaker's name to view other papers and abstracts submitted by this speaker)

Hannah G. Smith
Department of Forestry and Natural Resources
Purdue University
West Lafayette, IN, USA


MAIN : Poster : Frog Reference Genome: PFAS Developmental Exposure
Powered By VIN
SAID=27