A Better Way to Buffer: Pilot Study on Buffering Capability of Sodium Bicarbonate and Sodium Carbonate Used in Conjunction with Tricaine Methanesulfonate (MS-222) During Anesthetic Procedures in Marine and Freshwater Settings
IAAAM 2021
Lindsey Waxman1*; Ari Fustukjian1; Veronica Thompson1
1The Florida Aquarium, Tampa, FL, USA

Abstract

Tricaine methanesulfonate (MS-222) is a widely used aquatic immersion anesthetic that is considered to be safe and effective despite its significant impact on the pH of water. There are many proven benefits to buffering MS-222 prior to patient administration. In addition to increased anesthetic efficacy, buffering of MS-222 can prevent patients from developing metabolic acidosis, skin irritation, and eye damage.1,2 In acidic environments, the anesthetic portion of MS-222 is positively charged, inhibiting its diffusion across the gills and increasing induction time.3

To neutralize the acidity of MS-222, and thus increase its efficacy and safety, current recommendations include buffering with sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) at a ratio of 2 parts sodium bicarbonate:1 part MS-222, on a dry weight basis. This is only recommended if the alkalinity is less than 50 mg/liter as CaCO3.2 Many institutions buffer independent of the water’s alkalinity or salinity, and some recommendations call for a 4:1 NaHCO3:MS-222 buffer.4 Other buffering agents used for medical procedures include sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) and hydroxide (OH-). The short-term impacts of bicarbonate and carbonate on pH and alkalinity have been frequently evaluated but have not fully infiltrated into aquatic medicine practice.5 Sodium carbonate dissociation allows for the immediate binding of two hydrogen molecules, resulting in a faster effect on pH. In contrast, sodium bicarbonate dissociates into carbonate and hydrogen, creating an initial pH decrease and increase in alkalinity.5,6

This study assessed the efficacy of this commonly used buffering method (2:1 NaHCO3:MS-222), as well as the buffering ability of sodium bicarbonate and sodium carbonate, at varying concentrations for short term anesthetic procedures in teleosts and elasmobranchs. The three components evaluated included: 1) retrospective evaluation of pH changes observed in MS-222 anesthetic immersion baths buffered with 2:1 NaHCO3:MS-222; 2) a pilot study evaluating various ratios of NaHCO3:MS-222 to achieve complete buffering; and 3) a pilot study evaluating various ratios of Na2CO3:MS-222 to achieve complete buffering. Results indicate the pH changes with sodium bicarbonate buffering in a 2:1 ratio showed a 0.24–0.89 pH decrease. In marine systems, that range narrowed to 0.25–0.56 pH units. Within the confines of this study, sodium bicarbonate buffering demonstrated a relative inability to return the pH of MS-222 solution to its unadulterated pH. Buffering with increased ratios of sodium bicarbonate demonstrated a pH plateau within the examined window, after which, no increases in sodium bicarbonate demonstrated any effect on the sample pH. Sodium carbonate buffering demonstrated a superior ability to return the anesthetic solution to its initial pH. Although further statistical analysis of the data is pending, we recommend buffering marine systems with sodium carbonate at a ratio of 0.5:1 MS-222 on a dry weight basis to provide adequate buffering capacity.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank The Florida Aquarium and its staff for their contributions to this study.

*Presenting author

Literature Cited

1.  Mylniczenko N, Neiffer D, Clauss T. 2014. Bony Fish (Lungfish, Sturgeon, and Teleosts). In: West G, Heard D, Caulkett N editors. Zoo Animal and Wildlife Immobilization and Anesthesia, 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, p 209–261.

2.  Noga, E. 2010. Methods for Treating Fish Diseases. In: Noga E editor. Fish Disease: Diagnosis and Treatment, 2nd ed., Wiley-Blackwell, p 375–420.

3.  Carter K, Woodley C, Brown R. 2010. A Review of Tricaine Methanesulfonate for Anesthesia of Fish. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, vol 2; 1:51–59.

4.  Mylniczenko N, Clauss T, Stamper A. 2014. Elasmobranchs and Holocephalans. In: West G, Heard D, Caulkett N editors. Zoo Animal and Wildlife Immobilization and Anesthesia, 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, p 261–301.

5.  Pankow, James F. 1991. Aquatic Chemistry Concepts. CRC.

6.  Millero, Frank J. 1996. Chemical Oceanography. 2nd ed., Taylor & Francis.

 

Speaker Information
(click the speaker's name to view other papers and abstracts submitted by this speaker)

Lindsey Waxman
The Florida Aquarium
Tampa, FL, USA


MAIN : Session 6: Anesthesia : NaHCO3 & Na2CO3 Buffering Capability with MS-222
Powered By VIN
SAID=27