Was It Worth It? Insights from Systematic Health Assessments of Dolphins Incidentally Caught in the Shark Nets off KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, over the past Seven Years (2010–2017)
IAAAM 2019
Stephanie Plön1*; Peter Wohlsein2; Emily Mitchell3; Greg J. Hofmeyr4; Morné de Wet3; Peter Thompson3; Ursula Siebert5
1Earth Stewardship Science Research Institute, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa; 2Department of Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover, Germany; 3Faculty of Veterinary Science at Onderstepoort, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, South Africa; 4Bayworld/Port Elizabeth Museum, Humewood, Port Elizabeth, South Africa; 5Institute for Terrestrial and Aquatic Animal Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover, Germany

Abstract

Shark nets have been in use off KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, since the 1950s.1 Besides sharks, these nets are also catching ‘harmless’ bycatch, such as dolphins.2 The most common species caught are the Indian Ocean humpback dolphin (Sousa plumbea), Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops aduncus) and long-beaked common dolphin (Delphinus capensis). Since 2010, systematic health investigations of the bycaught dolphins have been conducted under the assumption that these animals present a reflection of the wild populations found off KwaZulu-Natal. Initial findings for these populations (2010–2012) included the presence of pneumonia, enteritis, and lobomycosis.3 While these investigations provided valuable baseline information and indicated that the animals generally were in ‘good health’, they also suffered from small sample sizes, particularly for Sousa plumbea (n=5 vs. Tursiops aduncus).3 However, continued collection of data now allows us to investigate in detail our initial intuition that Sousa plumbea (total n=20) generally appears to be in ‘poor health’ compared to Tursiops aduncus (total n=62). Quantification of histopathological differences between the Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops aduncus) and the Indian Ocean humpback dolphin (Sousa plumbea) were investigated and will be presented in detail. Further biological information on diet and life history will be included.4,5 Both species have overlapping inshore distribution ranges, but while the former is more abundant and has a current conservation status of ‘vulnerable’, the latter has been declared ‘endangered’ in 2015 and represents South Africa’s first endangered marine mammal.6,7 The results from our work conducted in South Africa will also be discussed within the global context with regards to developments in marine mammal health.8,9

* Presenting author

Literature Cited

1.  Cliff G, Dudley SFJ. 1992. Protection against shark attack in South Africa, 1952 to 1990. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 43:263–272.

2.  Cockcroft VG. 1990. Dolphin catches in the Natal shark nets, 1980 to 1988. South African Journal of Wildlife Research. 20:44–51.

3.  Lane EP, de Wet M, Thompson P, Siebert U, Wohlsein P, Plön S. 2014. A systematic health assessment of Indian Ocean bottlenose (Tursiops aduncus) and Indo-Pacific humpback (Sousa plumbea) dolphins, incidentally caught in shark nets off the KwaZulu-Natal coast, South Africa. PloS One. 9: e0107038.

4.  Plön S, Albrecht KH, Cliff G, Froneman PW. 2012. Organ weights of three dolphin species (Sousa chinensis, Tursiops aduncus and Delphinus capensis) from South Africa: implications for ecological adaptation? Journal of Cetacean Research and Management. 12:265–276.

5.  Plön S, Cockcroft VG, Froneman PW. 2015a. The natural history and conservation of Indian Ocean humpback dolphins (Sousa plumbea) in South African waters. Advances in Marine Biology. 72:143–162.

6.  Cockcroft V, Natoli A, Reisinger R, Elwen S, Plön S, Hoelzel R, Atkins S. 2016. A Conservation Assessment of Tursiops aduncus. In: Child MF, Roxburgh L, Raimondo D, San EDL, Selier J, Davies-Mostert H, editors. The Red List of Mammals of South Africa, Swaziland and Lesotho. South Africa: South African National Biodiversity Institute and Endangered Wildlife Trust.

7.  Plön S, Atkins S, Conry D, Pistorius P, Cockcroft V, Child M. 2016. A Conservation Assessment of Sousa plumbea. In: Child MF, Raimondo D, San EDL, Roxburgh L, Davies-Mostert H, editors. The Red List of Mammals of South Africa, Swaziland and Lesotho. South Africa: South African National Biodiversity Institute and Endangered Wildlife Trust.

8.  Plön S, De Wet M, Lane E, Wohlsein P, Siebert U, Thompson P. 2015b. The importance of a standardized necropsy protocol for health investigations of small cetaceans in South Africa. African Journal of Wildlife Research. 45:332–341.

9.  Simeone CA, Gulland FMD, Norris T, Rowles TK. 2015. A systematic review of changes in marine mammal health in North America, 1972–2012: The need for a novel integrated approach. PLoS One. 10: e0142105.

 

Speaker Information
(click the speaker's name to view other papers and abstracts submitted by this speaker)

Stephanie Plön
Earth Stewardship Science Research Institute
Nelson Mandela University
Port Elizabeth, South Africa


MAIN : Session 2: Health & Ecosystem Assessments : Insights from Health Assessments of Dolphins
Powered By VIN
SAID=27