Electrocardiography in Dogs Anesthetized With Increasing Doses of Propofol Associated or Not With Nitrous Oxide
World Small Animal Veterinary Association World Congress Proceedings, 2005
C.T. Nishimori, DMV, MSc; N. Nunes, DMV, MSc, PhD; D.P. Paula, DMV, MSc; R. Carareto, DMV, MSc; P.C. Ferro, DMV; P.S.P. Santos, DMV, MSc, PhD; E.D.V. Conceição, DMV, MSc
Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, College of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil

The aim of this work was to evaluate fortuitous electrocardiographic alterations in dogs, promoted by increasing dose of propofol administrated by continuous infusion, associated or not to nitrous oxide.

Ten adult healthy mongrel dogs, males or females, were used. The animals were distributed into two equal groups (G1 and G2). General anesthesia was induced by intravenous administration of propofol (10 mg/kg), and immediately after, the dogs were intubated, and G1 received oxygen (30%) with nitrous oxide (70%), and G2 received oxygen (100%). Concomitantly, continuous infusion of propofol (0.4mg/kg/min) was initiated using an infusion pump. Measurements of heart rate (HR), duration and amplitude of P wave (Ps and PmV), P-R interval (PR), QRS complex duration (QRSs), R wave amplitude (RmV), Q-T interval (QT) and R-R interval (RR) were evaluated 30 minutes after the infusion beginning (M1), then 10 and 20 minutes after M1 (M2 and M3, respectively). After M3, infusion rate was increased to 0.6mg/kg/min, and elapsed 30, 40, and 50 minutes new measurements were realized (M4, M5 and M6, respectively). After M6 the infusion rate was increased again to 0.8mg/kg/min, and 30, 40 and 50 minutes after M6, further evaluations were repeated (M7, M8, and M9, respectively). Statistical analyses of the data were performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by the Tukey test (p<0.05).

The G2 demonstrated RR interval diminished when compared with G1 in M1 (G1=627.6±11.4; G2=437.4±74.72), and M2 (G1=587.4±105.26; G2=453.2±56.89), and in the equal moments, we could observe that G2 demonstrated HR values greater than G1 (M1: 99±17.63<139±24.44; M2: 105±22.4<135±19.19). These results probably were due to high induction rate and not due to infusion rates used.

We conclude that continuous infusion of propofol on these studied rates does not promote significant alterations in the electrocardiogram, and both anesthetic protocols analyzed could be safe methods to be used in patients with some cardiac damage.

Speaker Information
(click the speaker's name to view other papers and abstracts submitted by this speaker)

C.T. Nishimori, DMV, MSc
São Paulo State University
Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil

MAIN : Abstracts, Poster : Electrocardiography in Anesthetized Dogs
Powered By VIN

Friendly Reminder to Our Colleagues: Use of VIN content is limited to personal reference by VIN members. No portion of any VIN content may be copied or distributed without the expressed written permission of VIN.

Clinicians are reminded that you are ultimately responsible for the care of your patients. Any content that concerns treatment of your cases should be deemed recommendations by colleagues for you to consider in your case management decisions. Dosages should be confirmed prior to dispensing medications unfamiliar to you. To better understand the origins and logic behind these policies, and to discuss them with your colleagues, click here.

Images posted by VIN community members and displayed via VIN should not be considered of diagnostic quality and the ultimate interpretation of the images lies with the attending clinician. Suggestions, discussions and interpretation related to posted images are only that -- suggestions and recommendations which may be based upon less than diagnostic quality information.


777 W. Covell Blvd., Davis, CA 95616



  • Toll Free: 800-700-4636
  • From UK: 01-45-222-6154
  • From anywhere: (1)-530-756-4881
  • From Australia: 02-6145-2357