Determination of the Required Time for Appropriate Chemical De-Epithelialization of Ileal Segment for Cystoplasty: An Animal Model
World Small Animal Veterinary Association World Congress Proceedings, 2005
Hamid Reza Fattahian1;Jalal Bakhtiari; Mohammad Javad Gharagozlo;Abbas Veshkini; Seyed Reza Jafarzadeh; Iradj Nowrouzian
1Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran
Tehran, Iran

Introduction: To determine the required time for the appropriate enzymatic treatment of ileal segment to de-epithelialize its mucosa and to reduce its absorptive function for ileocystoplasty in dogs.

Materials and Methods: An experimental study was performed on 21 adult female Persian mixed breed dogs as follow. Negative control group (NCG): no ileocystoplasty was done. Positive control group (PCG): routine ileocystoplasty without enzymatic treatment of ileal segment was performed. Ileocystoplasty with 5, 10, 15, 20 or 25 minutes enzymatic treatment of ileal segment with collagenase and trypsin was performed on respective treatment group (5METG, 10METG, 15METG, 20METG and 25METG). Each group contained three dogs. The seven groups were then compared for hematologic, biochemical, and histologic changes and also glucose reabsorption by glucose absorption test.

Results: No dogs showed any signs of metabolic disturbances, biochemical and hematologic changes. Significant differences in blood glucose level (BGL) were found between groups at different times after glucose absorption test. Pair wise comparison revealed significant differences in BGL between NCG and the other groups except 25METG. No statistically significant difference was found in BGL between NCG and 25METG. The degree of histopathologic changes was correlated with duration of enzymatic treatment, so that the changes were more prominent in 25METG. No shrinkage and collagen deposition were observed.

Conclusions: Twenty-five minutes enzymatic treatment of the ileal segment is sufficient to omit the absorptive function of the augmented bladder, and is recommended for ileocystoplasty.


1.  Rink RC, Adams MC. Augmentation cystoplasty. In Walsh PC, Retik AB eds, Campbell's Urology. 7th edn, Vol. III. Chapt 102. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1998: 3167-3189.

2.  Turkeri LN, Simek F, Sav A, Ilker Y N, Akdas A. Enzymatic treatment of ileal segment used for urinary tract reconstruction. Int Urol Neph 1996: 28(5): 655-663.

3.  Niku SD, Scherz HC, Stein PC, Parsons, CL. Intestinal de-epithelialization and augmentation cystoplasty: an animal model. Urology 1995: 46(1): 36-39.

Speaker Information
(click the speaker's name to view other papers and abstracts submitted by this speaker)

Hamid Reza Fattahian

MAIN : Abstracts, Oral : Chemical De-Epithelialization
Powered By VIN

Friendly Reminder to Our Colleagues: Use of VIN content is limited to personal reference by VIN members. No portion of any VIN content may be copied or distributed without the expressed written permission of VIN.

Clinicians are reminded that you are ultimately responsible for the care of your patients. Any content that concerns treatment of your cases should be deemed recommendations by colleagues for you to consider in your case management decisions. Dosages should be confirmed prior to dispensing medications unfamiliar to you. To better understand the origins and logic behind these policies, and to discuss them with your colleagues, click here.

Images posted by VIN community members and displayed via VIN should not be considered of diagnostic quality and the ultimate interpretation of the images lies with the attending clinician. Suggestions, discussions and interpretation related to posted images are only that -- suggestions and recommendations which may be based upon less than diagnostic quality information.


777 W. Covell Blvd., Davis, CA 95616


  • Toll Free: 800-700-4636
  • From UK: 01-45-222-6154
  • From anywhere: (1)-530-756-4881
  • From Australia: 02-6145-2357