Selection and the Coevolution of Breeds and Disease-Liability Genes
Tufts' Canine and Feline Breeding and Genetics Conference, 2013
Jerold S. Bell, DVM
Department of Clinical Sciences, Tufts Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, North Grafton, MA, USA

Natural selection works against inherited traits and disorders that would reduce the ability to survive, thrive, and reproduce. Artificial selection can reduce the frequency of disease-liability genes, be neutral to their propagation, or sometimes preferentially select for them. Selection must be appropriately applied in order to improve breed health.

Purebred dog and pedigree cat breeds evolved through selection for conformational, behavioral, and/or working standards. With extreme phenotypic selection, breeders have purposely selected for disease liability, such as the brachycephalic syndrome, excessive amounts of skin or skin folds, and overangulation.

Selection for traits has been linked to disease liability, such as hyperuricosuria (SLC2A9) in Dalmatians, craniofacial defect (unpublished, Lyons) in Burmese, dermoid sinus (FGF3, FGF4, FGF19 and ORAOV1 duplication) in Ridgebacks, and osteochondrodysplasia (unidentified) in Scottish Folds. In some cases, the preferred trait can be genetically separated from the disease liability. In other cases, they are pleiotropic expressions of the same genotype.

Other disease liability genes are not linked to selection, but they lay in the genetic background of breeds. Many of these are ancient mutations that preceded the separation of and are shared by many breeds. These include complex disorders, such as hip dysplasia, patella luxation, and diabetes mellitus (Types 1 & 2). Several ancestrally ancient mutations cause simple Mendelian disorders, such as progressive rod-cone degeneration (prcd), multifocal retinopathy (cmr1), and hyperuricosuria (SLC2A9). Without direct selection, these can increase in frequency through the popular sire effect or genetic drift.

Some recommendations to improve the genetic health of breeds concentrate on selection to increase heterozygosity or minor allele frequencies. These methods 1) do not select against disease-liability genes; 2) will not prevent the phenotypic expression of dispersed genes; and 3) may reverse the effects of positive selection through blind manipulation of minor alleles. Health-based selection should be specifically directed against deleterious traits and genes.


Speaker Information
(click the speaker's name to view other papers and abstracts submitted by this speaker)

Jerold S. Bell, DVM
Department of Clinical Sciences
Tufts Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine
North Grafton, MA, USA

MAIN : Posters : Breeds & Disease-Liability Genes
Powered By VIN

Friendly Reminder to Our Colleagues: Use of VIN content is limited to personal reference by VIN members. No portion of any VIN content may be copied or distributed without the expressed written permission of VIN.

Clinicians are reminded that you are ultimately responsible for the care of your patients. Any content that concerns treatment of your cases should be deemed recommendations by colleagues for you to consider in your case management decisions. Dosages should be confirmed prior to dispensing medications unfamiliar to you. To better understand the origins and logic behind these policies, and to discuss them with your colleagues, click here.

Images posted by VIN community members and displayed via VIN should not be considered of diagnostic quality and the ultimate interpretation of the images lies with the attending clinician. Suggestions, discussions and interpretation related to posted images are only that -- suggestions and recommendations which may be based upon less than diagnostic quality information.


777 W. Covell Blvd., Davis, CA 95616


  • Toll Free: 800-700-4636
  • From UK: 01-45-222-6154
  • From anywhere: (1)-530-756-4881
  • From Australia: 02-6145-2357