|
|
Topical and oral emodepside formulations for last-line treatment of multianthelmintic drug-resistant hookworms when given orally to dogs are not bioequivalent.Am J Vet Res. July 2025;86(7):.1 Department of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.; 2 Department of Anatomy and Physiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.; 3 Department of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.; 4 Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.; 5 Department of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.; 6 Department of Anatomy and Physiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
AbstractOBJECTIVE:To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of emodepside in dogs following single-dose administration of the FDA-approved feline topical solution orally and topically and the European Medicines Agency-approved canine modified-release tablet orally and to assess the bioequivalence of the feline topical solution administered orally compared to the canine modified-release tablet.
METHODS:This study was conducted in 3 phases, during which dogs received single doses of emodepside as the feline topical solution (1 mg/kg) orally, the canine modified-release tablet (1 mg/kg) orally, and the topical feline solution (3 mg/kg) topically. Plasma pharmacokinetic profiles were determined for 21 days postdose. Bioequivalence testing was conducted for orally administered emodepside.
RESULTS:7 healthy client-owned dogs (4 female and 3 male) were prospectively enrolled in this crossover study from May through August 2023. Oral administration of the feline topical solution resulted in markedly greater emodepside absorption than the modified-release tablet and was not bioequivalent. Emodepside plasma concentrations following topical administration of the FDA formulation were 36- to 122-fold lower than after oral administration.
CONCLUSIONS:The feline topical solution administered orally at 1 mg/kg is not bioequivalent to the canine modified-release tablet. Markedly higher absorption of the feline topical solution administered orally raises potential safety concerns for extralabel use in dogs to treat multianthelmintic drug-resistant hookworm infections. Poor absorption following topical administration suggests it may be unsuitable for treating multianthelmintic drug-resistant hookworm infections.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE:These findings highlight potential emodepside toxicity risks with extralabel use of the FDA-approved topical feline product and help inform safe off-label use in dogs.
Keywords
|
Article Tools:
Archives Highlights:
|
|
|
|
800.700.4636 | help@vspn.org | 530.756.4881 | Fax: 530.756.6035
777 West Covell Blvd, Davis, CA 95616 Copyright 1991-2025, Veterinary Information Network, Inc. |
Contact Us |