VSPN AOW : Survey of occupational ha... |
Survey of occupational hazards in Minnesota veterinary practices in 2012.J Am Vet Med Assoc. January 2016;248(2):207-18.
AbstractOBJECTIVE:To identify the scope of occupational hazards encountered by veterinary personnel and compare hazard exposures between veterinarians and technicians working in small and large animal practices.
DESIGN:Cross-sectional survey.
POPULATION:Licensed veterinarians and veterinary staff in Minnesota.
PROCEDURES:A survey of Minnesota veterinary personnel was conducted between February 1 and December 1, 2012. Adult veterinary personnel working in clinical practice for > 12 months were eligible to participate. Information was collected on various workplace hazards as well as on workplace safety culture.
RESULTS:831 eligible people responded, representing approximately 10% of Minnesota veterinary personnel. A greater proportion of veterinarians (93%; 368/394) reported having received preexposure rabies vaccinations than did veterinary technicians (54%; 198/365). During their career, 226 (27%) respondents had acquired at least 1 zoonotic infection and 636 (77%) had been injured by a needle or other sharps. Recapping of needles was reported by 87% of respondents; the most common reason reported by veterinarians (41%; 142/345) and veterinary technicians (71%; 238/333) was being trained to do so at school or work. Recent feelings of depression were reported by 204 (25%) respondents. A greater proportion of technicians (42%; 155/365) than veterinarians (21%; 81/394) indicated working in an environment in which employees experienced some form of workplace abuse.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE:Veterinary personnel in Minnesota were exposed to several work-related hazards. Practice staff should assess workplace hazards, implement controls, and incorporate instruction on occupational health into employee training.
Companion NotesCross-sectional survey of occupational hazards encountered by veterinary personnel - licensed veterinarians and veterinary staff in Minnesota surveyed - from Minnesota Department of Health
Introduction to occupational hazards in clinical veterinary medicine - animal-related injury at some time during career is common according to 7 surveys - experienced by 50-67% of veterinarians - experienced by 98% of veterinary technicians - reported injuries include the following: - animal bites - kicks - scratches - crushing by equipment for animal restraint - chemicals - topicals, hormones, pesticides, disinfectants and antineoplastics - physical hazards including radiation exposure, needlestick and sharps injuries - musculoskeletal disorder (MSD) from trauma and repetitive movements - shoulder and neck pain in large animal veterinarians - possibly from rectal palpations - biological hazards including zoonotic infections - dermatophytosis and bite wound infections are the 2 most common - environments animals are kept in can affect respiratory and physical health - possibly causing asthma, allergies, hearing loss, frostbite and others - reproductive hazards for women of childbearing age - mental-health or psychosocial hazards - stress, substance abuse, depression, anxiety and suicide
Study design - study population: veterinary personnel - 394 respondents were veterinarians, 365 were veterinary technicians - 72 were office staff - Minnesota Board of Veterinary Medicine reported the following: - 2,034 licensed veterinarians in Minnesota - estimated 5,600 veterinary technicians in Minnesota - median age of respondents: 39 years of age with a range of 20-89 years - 80% were women, 98% were white and 2% were Hispanic - 66% were small animal personnel - procedure: survey filled in electronically or on paper from 2/1/12-12/1/12 - Minnesota veterinary personnel surveyed (anonymous) - adults working in clinical practice for > 12 months - information collected on workplace hazards and workplace safety culture
Results (831 people responded or about 10% of Minnesota veterinary personnel) - 89% of respondents reported being generally happy in current job - 34% reported workplace stress adversely affected their health or well-being (in the past 12 months) - 25% reported recent feelings of depression - reported “feeling down, depressed, and hopeless” during their career - 22% reported seeking medical care for depression at some point during career - 20% reported “feeling little interest or pleasure in doing things” - many reported some form of hostility at work - social exclusion of employees, 23% - yelling, 13% - bullying, 11% - throwing things, 7% - threats, 3% - physical violence, 1% - proportion of personnel working in an unhealthy work environment (unhealthy meaning ≥ 1 of the 6 conditions above) - veterinary technicians, 42% - significantly larger proportion than incurred by veterinarians - veterinarians, 21% - 35% considered their job dangerous - 35% reported they currently had or had at 1 time developed an MSD due to work - back, shoulder, neck and wrist MSDs most commonly - significantly larger proportion in large vs small animal veterinarians - 27% reported having at least 1 zoonotic infection - dermatophytosis, 68% - bite wound infections, 48% - salmonellosis, 7% - cryptosporidiosis, 6% - 77% reported injury from a needle or other sharps - 87% reported recapping of needles - because they were trained to do so at school or work - veterinarians, 52% - veterinary technicians, 71% - environment in which employees experienced some form of workplace abuse - reported by 42% of veterinary technicians - reported by 21% of veterinarians - preexposure rabies vaccination during their career - reported by 93% of veterinarians - reported by 54% of veterinary technicians - testing for rabies neutralizing antibody titers within 2 years before survey date - reported by 29% of veterinarians (not significantly different from technicians) - reported by 35% of veterinary technicians - adverse reproductive outcome (miscarriage or preterm labor) - 43% of women reported at least 1 pregnancy during their career - 6% of them believed they had had an adverse reproductive outcome - due to their work in veterinary medicine (41% had a miscarriage) - 93% reported taking additional precautions while pregnant - 82% reported participating in at least 1 possibly adverse activity (adverse to their pregnancy while pregnant) - 16% reported having asthma - 10% reported having asthma before working in veterinary medicine - prevalence of asthma in adults in the US is ~ 8%
"The hazards that exist in veterinary medicine, however, are often unique to the field and extend beyond physical activities. In veterinary medicine, personnel are at risk for animal-related injuries, needlestick or sharps injuries, acquiring infectious diseases, and exposure to radiation and harmful chemicals that can impact gestation."
|
Article Tools:
Grants:
CC999999 Intramural CDC HHS
Archives Highlights:
|
VSPN AOW : Survey of occupational ha... |
800.700.4636 | help@vspn.org | 530.756.4881 | Fax: 530.756.6035
777 West Covell Blvd, Davis, CA 95616 Copyright 1991-2024, Veterinary Information Network, Inc. |
Contact Us |